B&
Bausch & Lomb Corp (BLCO)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Revenue was $1.137B (+3% reported, +5% cc) with Vision Care and Surgical growing, while Pharmaceuticals was flat as reported; adjusted EPS ex IPR&D was ($0.07). The quarter missed Wall Street consensus on both revenue ($1.150B*) and EPS ($0.02*), driven by enVista IOL recall costs, FX headwinds, and U.S. generics softness .
- Management raised full-year revenue guidance to $5.0–$5.1B and updated adjusted EBITDA ex IPR&D to $850–$900M to absorb the one-time recall impact and FX; constant-currency growth is now ~4.5–6.5% including recall, ~5.5–7.5% excluding it .
- enVista IOLs returned to market about a month after the voluntary recall, with enhanced inspection protocols; surgeon feedback at ASCRS indicated rapid re-adoption, suggesting Q3–Q4 normalization in Implantables .
- MIEBO momentum continued (Q1 revenue $57M, +8% seq; weekly TRx ~20k), while XIIDRA delivered $67M with +14% YoY TRx growth but heavier gross-to-net deductions; expect sequential improvement as seasonality fades and access investments pull through .
- Key stock catalysts: fast recall resolution and ramp of premium IOLs, Daily SiHy sustained outperformance, and tariff mitigation progress; watch Q2 recall drag, tariff policy fluidity, and XIIDRA gross-to-net trajectory .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
- What Went Well
- Premium IOLs and Implantables strength: Surgical grew +11% cc with Implantables +26% and Premium IOLs +77%, highlighting category momentum and supporting guidance confidence post recall .
- Daily SiHy leadership: Daily SiHy revenue grew +42% cc (U.S. +56%), with INFUSE/ULTRA contributing; Blink OTC portfolio up +85% and dry eye OTC revenue $92M (+15%) .
- Rapid enVista recovery: “Patient safety is nonnegotiable... We voluntarily pulled the lenses... Our ability to return to market approximately 1 month later is nothing short of remarkable” — Brent Saunders .
- What Went Wrong
- EPS and revenue miss vs consensus: Q1 revenue $1.137B vs $1.150B*; adjusted EPS ex IPR&D ($0.07) vs $0.02*; drivers include ~$16M recall impact, U.S. generics decline, and $7M FX headwind on EBITDA .
- Margin compression: Adjusted gross margin fell to 59.5%, with ~140 bps one-time headwind from the recall and XIIDRA gross-to-net pressure in Q1 seasonally .
- Tariffs overhang: Management quantified a potential ~120 bps adjusted EBITDA margin headwind in 2025 (not embedded in guidance), implying risk if policy persists .
Financial Results
Revenue and EPS progression (oldest → newest):
Q1 2025 actual vs consensus:
Margins and profitability (oldest → newest):
Segment revenue (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
Selected KPIs (Q1 2025):
Note: Asterisked values are estimates. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Patient safety is nonnegotiable... We voluntarily pulled the lenses... [and] returned to market approximately 1 month later” — Brent Saunders on enVista .
- “We delivered mid-single-digit constant currency revenue growth... currency was a headwind of ~$19M to revenue and ~$7M to adjusted EBITDA” — CFO Sam Eldessouky .
- “Daily SiHy... grew a staggering 98% year-over-year prescriptions... 37% increase from Q4” — Brent Saunders on momentum and DTC impact .
- “We estimate tariffs to be a potential headwind of approximately 120 bps to adjusted EBITDA margin in 2025... our updated guidance does not reflect the potential tariff impact” — CFO .
- “Miebo... we have very high expectations... profitable starting next year” — Brent Saunders on MIEBO trajectory .
Q&A Highlights
- enVista recall impact and surgeon sentiment: Surgeons at ASCRS expressed strong trust and prompt re-adoption; management expects Q2 impact, then recovery in Q3–Q4 .
- Tariff phasing and mitigation: Q2 “well protected” via inventory/logistics; second-half exposure balanced across Q3/Q4, with further levers (manufacturing shifts, pricing) under evaluation .
- XIIDRA dynamics: Volume/TRx growth strong; gross-to-net pressure seasonally highest in Q1; programs rolling out to improve profitability; full-year XIIDRA strategy unchanged .
- Consumer demand vs destocking: Retailer inventory rebalancing persists, but consumption remains robust across brands; essential health products provide resilience; China CL +6% .
- Surgical pipeline: LuxLife EU launch, MIGS (Elios) anticipated U.S. approval late 2025/early 2026; additional premium IOL launches and equipment upgrades forthcoming .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs Wall Street consensus (S&P Global): Revenue $1.137B vs $1.150B* (miss); Primary EPS ($0.07) vs $0.02* (miss). Estimate shortfall reflects recall cost (
$16M), FX ($19M revenue headwind), and U.S. generics pressure . - Near-term modeling: Management reiterated seasonality (Q1 lowest, Q4 highest), Q2 more recall impact, with Implantables ramp in Q3–Q4; tariff impact excluded from guidance pending mitigation and policy clarity .
Note: Asterisked values are estimates. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The quarter was a controlled reset: core growth intact (Vision Care +5% cc; Surgical +11% cc), but recall/FX/generics drove a consensus miss; watch margin normalization as recall fades .
- Guidance is credibly adjusted: revenue range raised and FX improved; EBITDA lowered to absorb recall; management articulated clear phasing and recovery trajectory .
- Premium IOLs are a 2H catalyst: rapid enVista return plus LuxLife EU launch should re-accelerate Implantables; Q2 is the trough, with Q3–Q4 ramp .
- Daily SiHy and OTC brands drive durable growth: structural share gains in lenses and strong DTC execution (Blink, LUMIFY) support top-line resilience across cycles .
- XIIDRA/MIEBO strategy is working: expect volume growth to outpace Q1 gross-to-net headwinds; MIEBO profitability inflects in 2026 with continued DTC and access leverage .
- Tariffs are a policy overhang but manageable: 120 bps EBITDA headwind potential not in guidance; inventory, manufacturing shifts, and pricing provide levers; monitor updates .
- Trading setup: Expect near-term volatility around Q2 recall costs and tariff headlines; positioning into Q3–Q4 for Implantables recovery and sustained Daily SiHy/OTC momentum could be attractive if execution and mitigation progress continue .